检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Hong Lian
机构地区:[1]Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou,China
出 处:《The Journal of Chinese Sociology》2018年第1期15-39,共25页中国社会学杂志(英文)
基 金:supported by a grant from the fundamental research funds for the central universities(No:17wkzd25).
摘 要:Researchers of the Chinese bureaucracy generally believe that policy promotion depends on the power of the party committees because they have absolute authority in China.This intuitive argument,however,lacks support from rigorous empirical research and theoretical analyses.Through close observation of the Bureau of Justice,this paper analyzes how differentiated authority affects organizational interaction and triggers the corresponding government behavior.The paper finds that while the functional bureaus could use professional authority to carry out policies,they nevertheless choose to rely on the administrative authority of the government and the political authority of the party committee.We illustrate the process,mechanism,and consequences of attention competition.The process reflects that the party committee has real authority,while the government has formal authority and the functional bureaus have only symbolic authority.This differentiated authority has three consequences:(1)the“Matthew effect”of the authority structure,(2)functional bureaus competing fiercely for the party committees’attention at the expense of accomplishing routine work,and(3)rule of the leader’s personal preference instead of the rule of law in governance.
关 键 词:Attention competition Multi-task principal-agent theory Differentiated authority Government behavior
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15