检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:屠民琦 史朝亮 马赞颂 徐耀宗 张燕宾 施国伟 TU Minqi;SHI Chaoliang;MA Zansong;XU Yaozong;ZHANG Yanbin;SHI Guowei(Department of Urology,The Fifth People s Hospital of Shanghai,Fudan University,Shanghai 200240,China)
机构地区:[1]复旦大学附属上海市第五人民医院泌尿外科,上海200240
出 处:《现代泌尿外科杂志》2022年第7期548-551,共4页Journal of Modern Urology
基 金:上海市闵行区自然科学研究课题资助(No.2019MHZ096)。
摘 要:目的观察功能性电刺激治疗男性勃起功能障碍(ED)的临床疗效和安全性。方法选取2019年3月-2021年6月在我院泌尿外科门诊诊治的24例ED患者作为研究对象,随机分成试验组和对照组各12例:试验组采用低频电刺激治疗;对照组采用同一台仪器,亮灯但不予以低频电刺激。每周接受2次治疗,4周为一个疗程。分别在治疗前和治疗后记录和比较两组患者国际勃起功能指数(IIEF-5)评分、阴茎硬度评分(EHS)、男性性欲量表四项(MSF-4)、生活质量评分(QoL)、生存质量测定量表简表(QoL-BREF)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)及血清总睾酮(TT)水平,并观察患者治疗期间的不良反应。结果组内比较:试验组治疗前后IIEF-5、EHS、MSF-4评分及TT水平升高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),而对照组治疗前后各项指标无统计学差异(P>0.05)。组间比较:治疗前两组各项指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后试验组IIEF-5、EHS、MSF-4评分及TT水平比对照组高,差异具统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者均未见严重不良反应。结论采用功能性电刺激治疗男性勃起功能障碍,具有一定的疗效,且安全可靠,值得临床推广。Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of functional electrical stimulation(FES)in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction(ED).Methods A total of 24 ED patients treated during Mar.2019 and Jun.2021 were randomly divided into the trial group(n=12)and control group(n=12).The trial group was treated with low-frequency electrical stimulation.For the control group,the light of the instrument was turned on but no electrical stimulation was given.Both groups were treated twice every week for 4 weeks.The scores of International Index of Erectile Function-5(IIEF-5),Erectile Hardness Score(EHS),Four Items on the Male Sexual Desire Scale(MSF-4),Quality of Life Scale(QoL),Quality of Life-BREF(QoL-BREF),Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS)and total testosterone(TT)before and after treatment were recorded and compared between the two groups.The adverse reactions were observed.Results Intragroup comparison:IIEF-5 score,EHS,MSF-4 and TT were significantly increased in the trial group after treatment(P<0.05),while there were no differences in the control group.Intergroup comparison:IIEF-5,EHS,MSF-4 and TT were significantly higher in the trial group than in the control group(P<0.05)after treatment,while there were no differences before treatment.No serious adverse reactions were observed.Conclusion FES is effective,safe and reliable in the treatment of ED,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
关 键 词:功能性电刺激(FES) 勃起功能障碍(ED) 国际勃起功能指数评分(IIEF-5) 阴茎硬度评分(EHS) 男性性欲量表四项(MSF-4) 生活质量评分(QoL) 生存质量测定量表简表(QoL-BREF) 焦虑自评量表(SAS) 总睾酮
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.201.186