宣扬恐怖主义罪“行刑界分”难题之解决  

The Solution to the Problem of“Penalty Demarcation”for the Crime of Promoting Terrorism

作　　者：周杰[1] ZHOU Jie(Soochow University,Suzhou Jiangsu 215006)

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《山西警察学院学报》2022年第3期12-19,共8页Journal of Shanxi Police College

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“跨国网络行动的国家责任问题研究”(17YJC820070)的成果之一。

摘　　要：宣扬恐怖主义罪在司法适用过程中已经出现了严重的行刑衔接不畅的问题,该问题的出现不仅反映出我国立法与司法部门仍然具有浓重的“刑法工具主义”思维,而且也反映出我国刑法学界尚未能为抽象危险犯的合理出罪提供一套令人满意的理论。就本罪可能的出罪路径而言,对抽象危险的实质化认定基本不能解决本罪行刑界分混乱的问题。强调对恐怖主义物品的独立司法认定也难以有效解决这一问题。只有将恐怖主义目的解释为本罪成立的主观构成要件要素,才能为问题的解决提供高效的方法。这种解释路径在理论上具有必要性与可行性,值得我国司法机关广泛采纳。In the process of judicial application of the crime of promoting terrorism,there has been asevere problem of poor connection between execution and punishment,which reflects that China s legislative and judicial departments still have a strong “criminal law instrumentalism” thinking,and reflects that China s criminal law academic community has not yet been able to provide a satisfactory set of theories for the reasonable criminalization of abstract dangerous criminals.In terms of the possible path of the crime,the substantive determination of abstract danger,in essence,cannot solve the problem of confusion in the criminal division.The emphasis on an independent judicial determination of terrorist objects is also difficult to effectively address this problem.Only the interpretation of terrorist purpose as a subjective element of the crime can provide an efficient solution to the problem.This path of interpretation is theoretically necessary and feasible,and deserves to be widely adopted by our judicial authorities.

关 键 词：宣扬恐怖主义 行刑交叉 抽象危险犯 目的犯 不成文构成要件要素 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]