中国社会史论战与马克思主义史学的崛起  

Controversy over China’s Social History and the Rise of Marxist Historiography

作　　者：左玉河[1,2] Zuo Yuhe

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学历史学院,北京100101 [2]中国历史研究院左玉河工作室

出　　处：《历史研究》2022年第2期4-21,M0003,共19页Historical Research

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“中国马克思主义历史理论发展史研究”(21AZS001)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：20世纪30年代的中国社会史论战是由政治分歧引发的学术论争。虽然论战各方不同程度地运用唯物史观展开历史研究,但实质蕴含着马克思主义史学与非马克思主义史学的根本分歧。社会史论战塑造了马克思主义史学求真与致用并重的学术品格。唯物史观的传播与马克思主义史学的崛起,促使20世纪中国史学的研究旨趣、研究范式、研究领域发生深刻变革,为推动中国史学进步作出了重大贡献。The controversy over China’s social history in the 1930 s was an academic debate sparked by political differences. Although all sides of the controversy applied the materialist conception of history to historical research to varying degrees, the controversy refl ected the fundamental differences between Marxist and non-Marxist historiography. The differences in perceptions of the materialist conception of history and the different political tendencies of the various schools of thought involved in the controversy led to academic disagreements and school divisions, as well as the emergence of Marxist historiography. The controversy over China’s social history had shaped the academic character of Marxist historiography, which places equal emphasis on truth-seeking and application. The spread of the materialist conception of history and the rise of Marxist historiography led to profound changes in the research purport, research paradigms, and fi elds of study in twentieth-century Chinese historiography, and contributed signifi cantly to its advancement.

关 键 词：唯物史观 马克思主义史学 社会史论战 历史理论 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]