检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘小磊[1] 冯谊[1] 张建保[1] Pan Xiaolei;Feng Yi;Zhang Jianbao(Department of Radiology,Zhengzhou Orthopedic Hospital,Zhengzhou 450052,China)
出 处:《中国实用医刊》2022年第8期80-82,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨X线与磁共振成像(MRI)对肩袖钙化性肌腱炎的诊断价值。方法抽取2018年1月至2020年12月郑州市骨科医院经临床确诊且均接受X线与MRI检查的52例肩袖钙化性肌腱炎患者,分析并比较其检查结果。结果X线检查大部分可见钙化灶;MRI检查结果显示T2加权成像(T2WI)、质子密度加权成像(PDWI)多为低信号,T1加权成像为低信号。不同肌腱部位钙化灶在MRI诊断长短径上比较差异未见统计学意义(P>0.05)。X线诊断肩袖钙化性肌腱炎的符合率为86.54%(45/52),MRI诊断符合率为94.23%(49/52),差异未见统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论肩袖钙化性肌腱炎应用X线与MRI诊断均有较高的价值,但X线因体位、骨重叠等导致其有漏诊可能,而MRI可结合T2WI、PDWI等多序列扫描综合评估,为临床提供更多的参考依据。Objective To investigate the value of X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)in the diagnosis of rotator cuff calcific tendinitis.Methods A total of 52 patients with rotator cuff calcified tendinitis diagnosed and examined by X-ray and MRI from January 2018 to December 2020 in Zhengzhou Orthopedic Hospital were included.And the examination results were analyzed and compared.Results Most of the calcifications can be seen in X-ray diagnosis,while results of MRI diagnosis showed common low signal in T2-weighted image(T2WI)and proton density weighted imaging(PDWI),and low signal in T1-weighted image.There was no significatn difference in long and short diameters of calcifications of different tendon sites according to MRI diagnosis(P>0.05).The coincidence rate of X-ray diagnosis was 86.54%(45/52),and the diagnostic coincidence rate of MRI was 94.23%(49/52),and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusions X-ray and MRI have good value in the diagnosis of rotator cuff calcific tendinitis,but X-ray may miss the diagnosis due to body position and bone overlap.However,MRI in combination of T2WI and PDWI can provide more reference.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222