检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李文静 杨洪斌[1] LI Wen-jing;YANG Hong-bin
机构地区:[1]郑州大学法学院
出 处:《四川警察学院学报》2022年第3期52-59,共8页Journal of Sichuan Police College
基 金:2020年度河南省法学会法理法史学研究会项目“推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的法理阐释”(20HNFLFS007)。
摘 要:随着大数据技术的出现和人工智能时代的到来,算法越来越成为社会普遍关注的问题。算法的急速兴起导致算法风险不断出现,形成算法“黑箱”,这势必会给现行法律制度带来挑战。算法不是绝对中立的,法律需要对其进行规制。目前,人工智能算法法律规制面临算法不透明、算法正义观存在危机性和规制算法的针对性条款存在欠缺等困境。对此,应构建大数据时代算法透明制度,加强算法监管,细化立法条款,明确问责机制,以推进人工智能算法法律规制的完善。从长远来看,应立足数字人权保护,从宏观层面影响算法,从而实现从源头规制算法的目的。With the emergence of big data technology and the arrival of artificial intelligence era,algorithms have increasingly become a common concern in society.With the rise of algorithms,algorithm risks continue to ap⁃pear,forming an algorithm black box,which is bound to bring challenges to the current legal system.The algorithm is not absolutely neutral,and needs to be regulated by the law.At present,the legal regulation of artificial intelli⁃gence algorithms is faced with many difficulties,such as the opacity of algorithms,the crisis of algorithm justice concept,and the lack of targeted provisions to regulate algorithms.Therefore,it is necessary to build a transparent system of algorithms in the big data era,strengthen the regulation of algorithms,refine legislative provisions,and clarify the accountability mechanism so as to improve the legal regulation of artificial intelligence algorithms.In the long run,algorithm should be regulated from the source based on the protection of digital human rights,influencing the algorithm from the macro level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222