CAS仲裁政策的发展与未来选择:寻求克制与能动之间的平衡  

The Development and Future Options of CAS Arbitration Policy:Seeking a Balance Between Restraint and Activism

作　　者：王睿康 姜世波 WANG Ruikang;JIANG Shibo(Law School,Shandong University(Weihai),Weihai 264209,Shandong,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院(威海),山东威海264209

出　　处：《山东体育学院学报》2022年第3期16-24,共9页Journal of Shandong Sport University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(编号:20&ZD336)。

摘　　要：长期以来,国内和国际司法活动往往存在严格的克制政策或者积极的能动政策之间的游动和选择,这种政策博弈在国际体育仲裁院(CAS)的仲裁政策变化中同样有所体现。通过文献资料法、历史分析法、案例分析法等,阐述司法克制主义与司法能动主义的内涵,认为:CAS仲裁活动的准司法化趋势,竞技体育职业化、商业化的发展,以及仲裁员的专业偏好,为克制主义与能动主义在CAS仲裁场景的适用创造了条件。CAS成立初期奉行严格的克制主义,但重新审查权的确立为CAS能动仲裁奠定了根基,尤其是Bosman案件以来,CAS能动仲裁的价值日益凸显,而“Lex Sportiva”的形成则是CAS能动政策的集中体现。随着体育过分商业化和职业化的发展,竞技体育愈益关涉竞争政策和基本人权保障,司法审查的干预让CAS不得不开始转向能动性考量,但这种转向也是谨慎的。体育的特殊性决定了CAS的仲裁政策应当是寻求克制主义与能动主义之间的有益平衡,即在尊重当事人意思自治的前提下,以克制主义作为基本仲裁政策,以温和的能动主义作为仲裁政策的补充。For a long time,domestic and international judicial activities often have a choice between strict restraint policies or positive dynamic policies.This policy game is also reflected in the changes in the arbitration policy of the Court of Arbitration for Sports(CAS).Through the method of literature,historical analysis,case analysis and other research methods,this paper expounds the connotation of judicial restraint and judicial activism,and considers the quasi-judicial trend of CAS arbitration activities,the development of professionalization and commercialization of competitive sports,and the development of arbitrators.The professional preference created the conditions for the application of restraint and activism in the CAS arbitration scene.CAS pursued strict restraint in the early days of its establishment,but the establishment of the right to re-examine laid the foundation for CAS'active arbitration.Especially since the Bosman case,the value of CAS's active arbitration has become increasingly prominent,and the formation of"Lex Sportiva"is the result of CAS's active policy.Concentrated.Although with the development of excessive commercialization and professionalization of sports,competitive sports are more and more related to competition policy and basic human rights protection.The intervention of judicial review has forced CAS to begin to turn to active consideration,but this turn is also cautious.The particularity of sports determines that the arbitration policy of CAS should seek a beneficial balance between restraint and activism,that is,on the premise of respecting the autonomy of the parties,restraint as the basic arbitration policy and moderate activism as the arbitration policy supplement.

关 键 词：国际体育仲裁院 仲裁政策 司法克制主义 司法能动主义 

分 类 号：G812[文化科学—体育学]