检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏志民 张露露 文鹏 WEI Zhi-min;ZHANG Lu-lu;WEN Peng(Hubei Provincial Communications Planning and Design Institute Co.,Ltd.,Wuhan 430051,China;China Design Group Co.,Ltd.,Nanjing 210014,China)
机构地区:[1]湖北省交通规划设计院股份有限公司,湖北武汉430051 [2]华设设计集团股份有限公司,江苏南京210014
出 处:《水运工程》2022年第7期45-48,54,共5页Port & Waterway Engineering
摘 要:从混凝土材料、预应力钢筋材料、张拉控制应力限值系数和预应力损失计算等方面对比分析中、俄规范。以后张法空心板作为算例,得出如下结论:1)中俄规范在混凝土和钢筋材料的分类体系、预应力损失影响因素的考虑和部分预应力损失值计算上基本一致,但两者在细分规则、材料范围、分级数量考虑不同。2)在个别预应力损失计算中二者存在差别,总体来说中国规范计算结果更大。In this paper,the Chinese and Russian codes are compared and analyzed from aspects such as concrete materials,prestressed reinforcement materials,limit coefficients of control stress for prestressing,and prestress loss calculation.Taking a post-tensioned hollow slab as an example,we can draw the following conclusions:1)The Chinese and Russian codes are consistent in the classification system of concrete and reinforcement materials,the consideration of influencing factors in the prestress loss,and the calculation of some prestress loss values,while the two differ in the subdivision rules,material range,and classification quantity consideration.2)There are differences between the two in the calculation of individual prestress loss,and in general,the calculation results are greater under the Chinese code.
分 类 号:U656[交通运输工程—港口、海岸及近海工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249