检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙玉荣[1] 卢润佳 SUN Yu-rong;LU Run-jia(Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences at Beijing University of Technology,Beijing 100124,China)
出 处:《北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2022年第3期70-79,共10页Journal of Beijing Union University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:北京市社会科学基金项目/北京市教委社科计划重点项目“北京市数字文化产业良性发展的版权保障研究”(项目编号:SZ202210005003)。
摘 要:“场景完整性理论”重视纠纷化解的个性化、差异化应对,强调以动态的规范模型构建个人信息保护框架,在国外立法和司法实践中的应用越来越多。在我国个人信息保护纠纷司法裁判中,不乏在个人信息认定、判定同意规则的合理使用和利益平衡等问题上运用该理论化解争议,司法实践暗含着可归纳的理论应用规则,同时也暴露出舶来理论在我国司法实践中应用的不适应性。一方面,既要从已有的个人信息纠纷裁判中归纳总结该理论在司法应用上的实践经验与共性,提取纠纷化解的公因式;另一方面,对该理论也要做出符合我国实践需要的适当改进和创新,在理论基础上设计出与我国个人信息保护纠纷更契合的司法评价方案,回应个人信息保护实践关切。The contextual integrity theory,which emphasizes individualized and differentiated responses to dispute and a dynamic normative model to build a framework for personal information protection,has been increasingly applied in foreign legislation and judicial practice.In China’s judicial decisions on personal information protection disputes,there is no shortage of the use of the theory to resolve disputes on issues such as the identification of personal information,the reasonable use of the rules for determining consent and the balance of interests,etc.Judicial practice implies rules for the application of theory that can be summarized,but also reveals the unsuitability of the application of imported theory in China’s judicial practice.On the one hand,it is necessary to summarize the practical experience and commonalities in the judicial application of the theory from the existing personal information dispute decisions,and extract the common factorization for dispute resolution;on the other hand,it is also necessary to make appropriate improvements and innovations to the theory to meet the needs of China’s practice,and design a judicial evaluation scheme that is more suitable for China’s personal information protection disputes from the theoretical basis,so as to respond to the concerns of personal information protection practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.120.229