检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:信强[1,2,3] Xing Qiang
机构地区:[1]复旦大学 [2]复旦大学美国研究中心 [3]复旦大学台湾研究中心
出 处:《台湾研究》2022年第3期1-11,共11页Taiwan Studies
基 金:国家哲学社会科学基金重大项目(项目批准号:21&ZD170)阶段性成果。
摘 要:为了利用“台湾牌”打压中国,美国对台政策在拜登上台后发生进一步的嬗变,其政策基轴就是通过提升“与台湾关系法”的政策位阶、挑战联合国2758号决议、提升美台实质性关系等举措,持续虚化和解构美国的“一个中国”政策。拜登政府还试图把台湾纳入美国打造的全球“价值观联盟”以及“高科技联盟”的“双联盟架构”之中,以及积极推动台湾问题的“国际化”,以实现其“以台制华”的战略目标。但与此同时,拜登政府也面临着三重结构性“两难困境”,包括借推行“以台制华”的策略以展现“政治正确”与制定和实施理性的对华政策之间的两难;通过支持台湾以对华“政治示强”与“军事避险”防止中美冲突之间的两难;以及拉拢盟国介入台海事务与盟国不愿在台海问题上为美国火中取栗之间的两难。In order to make full use of the“Taiwan card”,the U.S.Taiwan policy has undergone further transmutation since President Joe Biden took office by elevating the policy status of the Taiwan Relations Act,challenging UN Resolution 2758,and enhancing the substantive U.S-Taiwan relationship,so as to continuously deflate and deconstruct the U.S.“One-China”policy.The Biden administration also attempts to integrate Taiwan into its“dual alliance structure”featuring global“values alliance”and“high-tech alliance,”and promotes the“internationalization”of the Taiwan question for its strategic goal of“containing China with Taiwan question”.However,the Biden administration is faced with a triple structural dilemma,including the dilemma between demonstrating“political correctness”by pursuing the strategy of“containing China with Taiwan question”and formulating and implementing a rational policy toward China,the dilemma between showcasing political stridency to China by supporting Taiwan administration and trying to avoid any disruptive U.S.-China military conflicts,as well as the dilemma between drawing its allies to intervene in Taiwan question and their reluctance to side with the U.S.to provoke China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229