检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李茜[1] 杨西子 Li Xi;Yang Xizi(Hunan University Law School,,Changsha 410000,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南大学法学院,长沙410000
出 处:《中国卫生法制》2022年第4期72-77,共6页China Health Law
基 金:2020年湖南省研究生科研创新项目资助,“构建高效公共卫生预警机制”(CX20200465);国家社科基金重点项目阶段性成果,“优化营商环境视角下营业权利保护研究”(20AFX018)。
摘 要:疫情举报人制度的发展在我国面临着公民将举报人与告密者混为一谈、立法不足以及举报人奖励不高等困境,最为主要的是我国在立法上针对举报人个人信息泄露未引起重视,这容易引发举报人招致打击报复。针对以上困境,在个人信息保护上可将区块链技术与之相结合,同时需在思想上对公民进行引导,这有利于举报人从告密文化中剥离。在举报人的奖励上,精神与物质上的奖励也是不可或缺的。由于我国对举报人的法律规定不多,也没有专门的举报人保护法案,因此应加快立法进程,完善我国举报人保护机制。The development of the informant system in China is faced with many difficulties,such as the confusion between informer and informant,the lack of legislation and the low reward system for informer.The most important dilemma is that the disclosure of personal information of whistle-blowers is not paid attention to in the legislation of China,which is easy to lead to retaliation against whistle-blowers.In view of the above difficulties,the protection of personal information can be combined with the blockchain technology.At the same time,our country needs to guide the citizens ideologically,which is conducive to the whistle-blower to get out of the whistle-blower culture.In the informer’s reward,the spirit and material reward is also indispensable.Because our country has few legal provisions on whistle-blower,and there is no special whistle-blower protection Act.Therefore,China should speed up the legislative process and perfect the informer protection mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.252.203