Bibliometrics Is Valuable Science.Why Do Some Journals Seem to Oppose It?  

作　　者：Brady Lund 

机构地区：[1]Emporia State University,1 Kellogg Circle,Emporia,Kansas 66801-2523,U.S.

出　　处：《Journal of Data and Information Science》2022年第3期1-4,共4页数据与情报科学学报（英文版）

摘　　要：Of all forms of research that can be accepted as valuable investigations,bibliometrics is often thought to be one of the most accessible to the widest number of researchers.Qualitative methods like interviewing and ethnography require extensive training,time,and often need ethical approval.Even basic quantitative methods like using questionnaires require significant drafting,mastery of language,and ethical review.Bibliometrics,being based on the analysis of publicly-available bibliographic data,does not have these requirements.Unlike with these other research approaches,where the top software(e.g.,SPSS,NVIVO)are expensive for researchers to afford.

关 键 词：approval INTERVIEW BIBLIOMETRICS 

分 类 号：G350[文化科学—情报学]