多维指标视角下我国社会科学的国际影响力研究——基于经济与商业管理SSCI论文的文献计量分析  

Global Impact of Social Sciences in China: Based on Bibliometric and Altmetric Indicators

作　　者：张立伟[1] 王珏 ZHANG Liwei;WANG Jue(School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship,Shandong University,Qingdao 266237,China;School of Social Sciences,Nanyang Technological University,Singapore 639798,Singapore)

机构地区：[1]山东大学国际创新转化学院,山东青岛266237 [2]南洋理工大学社会科学学院,新加坡639798

出　　处：《科学学与科学技术管理》2022年第5期30-47,共18页Science of Science and Management of S.& T.

基　　金：国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(72004118);中国科协高端科技创新智库青年项目(2021ZZZLFZB1207012)。

摘　　要：以近20年(2001—2020年)我国经济与商业管理领域发表的SSCI论文为样本,分别从学术影响和社会影响的角度对比分析了我国国际合作与非国际合作文献、主导文献与非主导文献的影响力差别。研究方法,指标设计上选择了WoS引用次数和Mendeley阅读人数作为学术影响指标,选择Twitter、Blogs、News outlets和Policy documents数量作为社会影响指标;分析方法上分别从国际合作维度(与美国合作、与其他国家合作和非国际合作)和主导性维度(中国主导、美国主导和其他国家主导)进行分析。研究发现,我国在经济与商业管理领域的研究已经取得了一定的成果,对国际合作的依赖性在降低,国际合作中的主导性也在加强。就非国际合作文献与国际合作文献、以及中国主导文献与非主导文献对比来看,学术影响差距在缩小,社会影响差距仍然很大。China is one of the top countries in the number of academic publications, but the quality and influence still lag compared with other leading western countries. There is also a deficiency in the discourse in the international scientific arena. Scholars are investigating China’s position in international collaboration and the international impact of China’s research. However, most of the studies are conducted with publication data before 2010, not covering the development in recent years. In addition, the studies on leading countries in international collaboration only consider corresponding authors, not taking into consideration the contribution from the first authors. Lastly, the international impact is only measured by citations, missing indicators based on webometrics and Altmetrics.To address the above issues, the study intends to investigate both the academic and social impact of China’s social science research in the international arena using the SSCI papers published by authors from China in economics, business,and management disciplines in the recent twenty years(2001—2020). The number of WoS citations and the number of readers on the Mendeley platform were used as the indicators for academic impact;while the number of posts on Twitter and Blogs, the number of News outlets reports, and the number of Policy documents citations were used to measure social impact. The bibliometric data were retrieved from the SSCI collection in the Web of Sciences and led to a total of66 648 publications with Chinese authors in economics, business, and management during the last twenty years. The altmetric data such as the number of Mendeley readers, the number of Twitter and Blogs recommendations, the number of News outlets reports, and the number of Policy documents citations were obtained from Altmetric.com. The analysis is done by comparing domestic-only publications with internationally co-authored ones, for which include co-authored with United States and co-authored with others countries, and by comparing rese

关 键 词：中国社会科学 国际合作 主导性 学术影响 社会影响 

分 类 号：G301[文化科学]