数字艺术品的权利凭证——NFT的价值来源、权利困境与应对方案  

Authority Certificate of the Digital Artwork——NFT’s Value Source, Right Dilemma and Countermeasures

作　　者：邓建鹏 李嘉宁[1] Deng Jianpeng;Li Jianing

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学法学院,北京100081 [2]中央财经大学金融科技法治研究中心,北京100081

出　　处：《探索与争鸣》2022年第6期87-95,178,共10页Exploration and Free Views

基　　金：中央财经大学新兴交叉学科建设项目“金融系统安全与区块链监管科技”(202103)。

摘　　要：非同质化通证可与链外特定数字艺术品形成一一对应的映射关系,为之提供权利凭证。非同质化通证的价值来源包括所映射的特定数字资产,也包括自身独立价值,应作为网络虚拟财产纳入物权保护范围。实践中非同质化通证面临“铸造权”缺乏制约、去中心化存储的悖论及碎片化等法治困境。作为应对方案,机构上线非同质化通证前应承担审查其来源合法性的义务,发生侵权纠纷后可采用“基于区块链的纠纷解决机制”;中心化存储可以向多中心存储机制转换,对境外公有链采取完全去中心化的存储机制,事先引入区块链安全公司审计,设置黑名单制度及全网信息通报机制;监管机构打击本领域“标准化合约交易”、非法资产证券化等违规行为。The non-fungible token can form a one-to-one mapping relationship with specific digital artworks outside the chain to provide the certificate of authority. The value source of the non-fungible token includes the mapped specific digital assets, as well as its own independent value, which should be included in the scope of property protection as a network virtual property. In practice, the non-fungible token is faced with many legal difficulties. As a response plan, the institution shall undertake the obligation to review the legitimacy of its source before launching the non-fungible token.

关 键 词：非同质化通证 权利凭证 数字艺术品 权利困境 区块链 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学] TP311.13[政治法律—法学]