国内外医疗纠纷解决机制比较  

Comparison of Medical Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in China and Abroad

作　　者：张旭东 田甜 易旭夫[2] 孙俊红[1] ZHANG Xu-dong;TIAN Tian;YI Xu-fu;SUN Jun-hong(School of Forensic Medicine,Shanxi Medical University,Taiyuan 030000,China;West China School of Basic Medical Sciences and Forensic Medicine,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China)

机构地区：[1]山西医科大学法医学院,山西太原030000 [2]四川大学华西基础医学与法医学院,四川成都610041

出　　处：《法医学杂志》2022年第2期150-157,共8页Journal of Forensic Medicine

摘　　要：医疗纠纷是全世界关心的共性问题之一,各国、各地区均建立了符合自身国情特点的医疗纠纷解决机制,医疗纠纷鉴定意见作为认定医患双方责任的重要依据之一,在医疗纠纷处理过程中起着举足轻重的作用。合理的医疗纠纷解决机制,规范的医疗纠纷鉴定模式,有助于柔性解决纠纷,减少医患矛盾。本文通过比较我国及其他具有代表性国家(美国、英国、法国、德国、意大利、日本等)的医疗纠纷解决机制和鉴定模式,探讨其各自的特点和不足,以期为我国医疗纠纷案件的解决和鉴定带来一些启示。Medical disputes are one of the common problems concerned by the whole world.All countries and regions have established their own medical dispute resolution mechanisms,in accordance with their own national conditions.Medical dispute identification opinions,as one of the important bases for identifying the responsibilities of both doctors and patients,play a pivotal role in the process of dispute settlement.A reasonable medical dispute resolution mechanism and standardized medical dispute identification model can help resolve disputes flexibly and reduce the conflict between doctors and patients.This paper briefly compares the medical dispute resolution mechanism and identification mode of China and several other representative countries(the United States,Britain,France,Germany,Italy,Japan,etc.),and discusses their respective characteristics and shortcomings,to bring some enlightenment to the medical dispute resolution and identification in our country.

关 键 词：法医学 医疗纠纷 医疗损害 解决机制 鉴定模式 综述 

分 类 号：DF795.1[医药卫生—法医学]