检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高燕[1] GAO Yan(Shijiazhuang Highway and Bridge Construction Group Co.Ltd.,Shijiazhuang 050000,China)
机构地区:[1]石家庄市公路桥梁建设集团有限公司,石家庄050000
出 处:《工程建设与设计》2022年第13期276-278,共3页Construction & Design for Engineering
摘 要:为研究填石路基土石比和压实方案对工程质量的影响,论文依托实际工程,在试验路段进行路基压实等各道工序,采用不同土石比和压实方案进行施工,并对竣工后填石路基进行沉降量与压实度检测。结果表明,最佳土石比为50∶50,压实方案采用分层碾压且碾压遍数不得低于7遍。In order to study the influence of soil to rock ratio and compaction scheme on engineering quality of rockfill roadbed,based on the actual project,the paper carries out various processes such as roadbed compaction in the test section.Different ratios of soil to rock and compaction schemes were used for construction,and the settlement and compaction degree of rockfill roadbed were tested after completion.The results show that the optimal ratio of soil to rock is 50∶50,and the compaction scheme adopts layered rolling and the number of rolling times should not be less than 7 times.
分 类 号:U416.1[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7