检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王喆琳 Wang Zhelin(School of Finance,Nankai University,Tianjin,300350)
机构地区:[1]南开大学金融学院,天津300350
出 处:《市场周刊》2022年第7期144-150,共7页Market Weekly
摘 要:在当今人口和信息高度流通的背景下,个体投资的本地偏好是否依然存在值得进一步探究。论文采用国内某线上交易平台2019~2020年投资者账户交易信息,分析跨省人口流动与省际资产配置的关系。实证结果显示,外地人口流入促进本地投资者增持人口输入地资产,人口输入地投资者本地偏好降低。而本地人口流出至外地并不会使本地投资者增配外地资产,甚至有可能降低对外地资产的投资,人口输出地投资者本地偏好不降反升。人口流动对输入地和输出地资产配置的影响呈现异质性。With high circulation of population and information,it is worth further exploring whether individual investor’s home bias still exists.This paper investigates the effect of immigration on intra-province asset allocation,based on the online transaction data of individual investors from 2019 to 2020 from online transaction platform.The empirical results show that the inward immigration significantly lowers the equity home bias and increases the local investment on equity from immigrants’birthplace.In addition,the outward immigration does not significantly influence the home investor nor make them increase investment on equity to immigrants’destination.equity home bias instead rises.The impact of inward and outward immigration on asset allocation is heterogeneous.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.192.254