检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:侯涛 王亚华[1,2] Hou Tao;Wang Yahua(School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084;China Institute for Rural Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084)
机构地区:[1]清华大学公共管理学院,北京100084 [2]清华大学中国农村研究院,北京100084
出 处:《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2022年第4期75-85,共11页Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“数字时代背景下推进农业农村现代化的战略、机制与政策研究”(22AZD050);国家自然科学基金创新群体项目“中国公共政策理论与治理机制研究”(71721002);清华大学文科建设“双高”计划专项“面向复杂社会生态系统诊断的公共事物治理研究”(2021TSG08204)。
摘 要:与城市相比,县域农村更接近非物质文化遗产的原生环境,研究县域非遗的空间分布规律及其背后的文化生态条件对推进我国非遗的生态性整体保护有着重要参考价值。借鉴社会生态系统(SES)框架,构建我国县域非遗资源分布的影响因素模型,结果表明:作为滋养孕育非遗资源的核心条件,物质文化遗产、传统村落等文化内环境因素对非遗资源存量影响最为显著;稳定的县域人口规模是保证非遗传承“后继有人”的必要基础;自然生态与经济因素对不同职业属性非遗资源分布的影响出现分化,弱职业属性非遗项目对原生自然环境具有较强依赖性并容易受到经济发展与工业化的冲击,强职业属性非遗项目则对自然环境条件不敏感且更容易在区域经济发展中受益。The cultural ecology of county and rural areas is closer to the original environment of intangible cultural heritage than that of the cities.It is of great significance to study the spatial distribution and influencing factors of the intangible cultural heritage in China’s county areas.Based on the SES framework,this paper constructs influencing factor models to figure out the potential cultural and ecological factors which may have significant impacts on the quantity of intangible cultural heritage resources in the county areas in China.The following conclusions are obtained 1.As direct conditions for nourishing and nurturing intangible cultural heritage resources,the internal environmental cultural factors such as material cultural heritage and traditional villages have the most significant impact on the stock of intangible cultural heritage resources in county areas.2.The stable population size of the county is a necessary foundation to ensure the inheritance of intangible cultural heritage.3.The influence of natural ecological and economic factors on the distribution of intangible cultural heritage resources with different occupational attributes is differentiated intangible cultural heritage projects with weak occupational attributes have a strong dependence on the native natural environment and are more vulnerable to the negative impact of economic development and industrialization,while intangible cultural heritage projects with strong occupational attributes are insensitive to natural environment conditions and more likely to benefit from economic development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49