日本近代学者解读“江户古学派”的日本优越论取向——以井上哲次郎与丸山真男为中心  

Modern Japanese Scholars Interpret the Japanese Superiority Theory of the"Edo School"——Inoue Tetsujiro and Maruyama Masao as the Central Focus

作　　者：董灏智[1] Dong Haozhi

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学历史文化学院,吉林长春130024

出　　处：《外国问题研究》2022年第1期23-30,126,共9页FOREIGN HISTORY STUDIES

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“江户日本的‘日式区域秩序’构想”(编号:19BSS048);中宣部文化名家暨宣传思想文化青年英才社科专门项目(编号:2004024);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“东亚世界与‘新文明体系’的形成研究”(编号:20JJD77003)。

摘　　要：考察日本思想史,江户“古学派”的说法出自日本近代学者之手。然而,“古学派”的说法自被提出之后,便成为日本学者的重要研究对象,被给予了极高的评价,尤其是井上哲次郎和丸山真男,前者从“道德论”的视角解读“古学派”,后者则强调“古学派”的“近代性”特征。重要的是,二人在解读“古学派”的过程中还不同程度地凸显出“日本优越论”的价值取向,成为后来日本学者解读“古学派”的主流基调,但其中亦有夸大之处,未能客观反映出“古学派”的思想价值。When we examine the history of Japanese thought,the term“ancient school”in Edo is attributed to modern Japanese scholars.However,since its introduction,the“ancient school”has become an important object of study for Japanese scholars and has been highly regarded,especially by Tetsujiro Inoue and Mao Maruyama,the former of whom interpreted the“ancient school”from the perspective of“moralism”and the latter of whom emphasized the“modernity”of the“ancient school”.The former interpreted the“ancient school”from the perspective of“moralism,”while the latter emphasized the“modernity”of the“ancient school.Importantly”,their interpretation of the“ancient school”also highlights,to varying degrees,the value of“Japanese superiority theory,”which has become the dominant tone in the interpretation of the“ancient school”by Japanese scholars since then.However,there are some exaggerations,which do not objectively reflect the ideological value of the“ancient school”.

关 键 词：日本 江户古学派 井上哲次郎 丸山真男 

分 类 号：K313.36[历史地理—历史学] B313[历史地理—世界史]