我国相邻权中的环境容忍义务优化路径研究  

Research on the Optimal Path of Environmental Tolerance Obligation in Adjacent Rights in China

作　　者：范俊荣[1] 翟雨嘉 Fan Junrong;Zhai Yujia(School of Humanity and Law,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150040,China)

机构地区：[1]东北林业大学文法学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150040

出　　处：《黑龙江工业学院学报（综合版）》2022年第6期115-120,共6页Journal of Heilongjiang University of Technology(Comprehensive Edition)

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“林业生物安全法律规制研究”(项目编号:2572020DZ05);中央高校基本科研业务专项资金项目“生物安全视角下野生动物保护法律对策研究”(项目编号:2572020DZ04);中央高校基本科研业务专项资金项目“我国自然保护地立法问题研究”(项目编号:2572021DF04)。

摘　　要：在我国司法实践中,在居住场所周边发生的环境污染案件屡见不鲜,基于相邻权而产生的环境纠纷也频繁地出现。法官在处理此类纠纷时一般利用《民法典》中相邻权的有关规定进行裁定,但作为相邻权的重要组成部分的容忍义务在法律中并未有明确规定。因而平衡当事人双方的利益,确立相邻权中的环境容忍义务对其进行立法设计是十分必要的。应当在法律中确定相邻权中的环境容忍义务,明确具体的判断标准,构建完善的救济体系,健全相邻权中环境容忍义务规则在司法上的应用。In judicial practice of China,environmental pollution cases around residential places are common,and environmental disputes based on adjacent rights also occur more frequently.When dealing with such disputes,judges generally adjust them through the relevant provisions on adjacent rights in the Civil Code,but the stipulations on the duty of tolerance an important part of adjacent rights,are not clearly stipulated in the law.Therefore,it is very necessary to balance the interests of both parties and establish the environmental tolerance obligation in the adjacent right to make legislative design for it.Therefore,the environmental tolerance obligation in adjacent right should be confirmed in law,specific judgment standards should be clarified,a perfect relief system should be constructed,and the application of environmental tolerance obligation rule in adjacent right should be perfected in judicature.

关 键 词：相邻权 环境容忍义务 环境侵权 

分 类 号：D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]