检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王轶希 居来提·买提肉孜[5] 王水泉[2] 张瑞[3] 曾欣 吴盼·努尔哈孜 杨宏涛 周志豪 帕尔哈提·热西提[6] WANG Yixi;Julaiti·MAITIROUZI;WANG Shuiquan;ZHANG Rui;ZENG Xin;Wupan·NUERHAZI;YANG Hongtao;ZHOU Zhihou;Paerhati·REXITI(the First Clinical Medical School,Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054,China;Basic Medical College,Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054,China;the Second Clinical Medical School,Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054,China;the Third Clinical Medical School,Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054,China;School of Mechanical Engineering,Xinjiang University,Urumqi 830046,China;Department of Spine Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054,China)
机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学第一临床医学院,乌鲁木齐830054 [2]新疆医科大学基础医学院,乌鲁木齐830054 [3]新疆医科大学第二临床医学院,乌鲁木齐830054 [4]新疆医科大学第三临床医学院,乌鲁木齐830054 [5]新疆大学机械工程学院,乌鲁木齐830046 [6]新疆医科大学第一附属医院脊柱外科,乌鲁木齐830054
出 处:《医用生物力学》2022年第3期485-491,共7页Journal of Medical Biomechanics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(81960415);国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(202010760005)。
摘 要:目的通过有限元分析传统椎弓根钉道(traditional trajectory,TT)和改良皮质骨钉道(modified cortical bone trajectory,MCBT)在骨质疏松椎体上的力学性能。方法建立L4椎体三维模型,在椎体两侧分别模拟置入椎弓根螺钉(pedicle screw,PS)(直径6.0 mm,长45 mm)和MCBT螺钉(直径4.5 mm,长40 mm)。比较螺钉在两种钉道上、下、左、右4种工况下载荷位移比和螺钉抗拔出力,评价在骨质疏松条件下螺钉和椎体之间的稳定性。结果MCBT螺钉抗拔出力比PS提高13.1%。MCBT螺钉在上、下、左工况下载荷位移比相比PS分别提高57.1%、32.3%、31.6%,MCBT螺钉在右工况下载荷位移比虽高于PS,但不具有统计学差异。在轴向旋转和侧屈工况下,MCBT组椎体载荷位移比明显高于TT组;在前屈工况下,MCBT组椎体载荷位移比低于TT组;在后伸工况下,MCBT组椎体载荷位移比虽高于TT组,但不具有统计学差异。结论MCBT在抗拔出力、螺钉稳定性、椎体轴向旋转和侧屈的稳定性优于TT,但在椎体前屈和后伸稳定性弱于TT。研究结果论证了MCBT在骨质疏松条件下的优越性,为MCBT的临床应用奠定前期基础。Objective To study mechanical properties of traditional trajectory(TT)and modified cortical bone trajectory(MCBT)on osteoporotic vertebrae through finite element analysis.Methods The three-dimensional model of L4 segment was established,and pedicle screw(PS)(diameter 6.0 mm,length 45 mm)and MCBT screw(diameter 4.5 mm,length 40 mm)were placed on both sides of the lumbar spine.The pull-out strength and the load-displacement ratio of screws in two different screw trajectories under up,down,left,right working conditions were analyzed,and the stability between the screw and vertebral body under osteoporotic conditions was evaluated.Results Compared with TT,the pull-out strength of MCBT screw was increased by 13.1%.Compared with PS,the load-displacement ratio of MCBT screw under up,down and left working conditions was increased by 57.2%,32.4%,and 31.6%.Under right working condition,although the load-displacement ratio of MCBT screw was higher than that of PS,no statistical difference was found.The load-displacement ratio of vertebral body in MCBT group under lateral bending and axial rotation was significantly higher than that in TT group.The load-displacement ratio of vertebral body in MCBT group under flexion was lower than that in TT group.Although the load-displacement ratio of vertebral body in MCBT group under extension was higher that that in TT group,no statistical difference was found.Conclusions MCBT is superior to TT in pull-out strength,screw stability and vertebral body stability under lateral bending and axial rotation,but its vertebral body stability under flexion and extension was weaker than that of TT.The research findings demonstrate the superiority of MCBT under osteoporotic conditions and lay the foundation for clinical application of MCBT.
分 类 号:R318.01[医药卫生—生物医学工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.40.192