检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Néstor Nuño Daniel Mäusezahl Jan Hattendorf Hector Verastegui Mariela Ortiz Stella M.Hartinger
机构地区:[1]Department of Public Health and Epidemiology,Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute,Kreuzstrasse 2,CH-4123,Allschwil,Switzerland [2]不详
出 处:《Infectious Diseases of Poverty》2022年第3期95-96,共2页贫困所致传染病(英文)
摘 要:Background: Unsafe drinking water,poor sanitation and hygiene,exposure to household air pollution and low cognitive and socio-emotional stimulation are risk factors affecting children in low-and middle-income countries.We implemented an integrated home-environmental intervention package(IHIP),comprising a kitchen sink,hygiene education and a certified improved biomass cookstove,and an early child development(ECD)programme to improve children´s health and developmental outcomes in the rural high-altitude Andes of Peru.Methods: We conducted a one-year cluster-randomised controlled trial among 317 children<36 months divided into 4 arms(IHIP+ECD,IHIP,ECD,and Control)and 40 clusters(10 clusters per arm).ECD status(socio-emotional,fine and gross motor,communication,cognitive skills,and an overall performance)measured with the Peruvian Infant Development Scale and the occurrence of self-reported child diarrhoea from caretakers were primary outcomes.Secondary outcomes included the occurrence of acute respiratory infections and the presence of thermo-tolerant faecal bacteria in drinking water.The trial was powered to compare each intervention against its control arm but it did not allow pairwise comparisons among the four arms.Primary analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle.For the statistical analysis,we employed generalised estimating equation models with robust standard errors and an independent correlation structure.Results: We obtained ECD information from 101 children who received the ECD intervention(individually and combined with IHIP)and 102 controls.Children who received the ECD intervention performed better in all the domains compared to controls.We found differences in the overall performance(64 vs.39%,odd ratio(OR):2.8;95%confidence interval(CI):1.6–4.9)and the cognitive domain(62 vs 46%,OR:1.9;95%CI:1.1–3.5).Data analysis of child morbidity included 154 children who received the IHIP intervention(individually and combined with ECD)and 156 controls.We recorded 110,666 child-days of information
关 键 词:Child development Clinical trial DIARRHOEA Improved biomass cookstoves Peru WASH
分 类 号:R12[医药卫生—环境卫生学] R15[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13