理性自律与判断责任:康德理论哲学的规范性维度  

Rational Autonomy and Responsibility of Judgment:the Normative Dimension of Kant’s Theoretical Philosophy

作　　者：韩东晖 Han DongHui

机构地区：[1]中国延安干部学院,陕西延安716000 [2]中国人民大学哲学院,北京100872

出　　处：《江西社会科学》2022年第5期5-13,206,共10页Jiangxi Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“规范性哲学研究”(21&ZD049)。

摘　　要：康德哲学的规范性转向为当代规范性哲学提供了取之不尽的思想资源,而要理解其规范性思想的总体,首先要在理论哲学层面阐明其关于理性立法与判断责任的规范性意蕴。由此出发,论证理性立法、自律和再自律的统一是康德规范性转向的基本精神,阐释性和规范性是先天综合判断的先验论证的合法性基础,规范性语汇与模态性语汇的统一是先天综合判断的有效性条件。The normative turn of Kant’s philosophy provides inexhaustible ideological resources for contemporary normative philosophy.To understand the overall normative thought,we must first clarify its normative meaning on rational legislation and judgment responsibility at the level of theoretical philosophy.From this point of view,it is demonstrated that the unity of rational legislation,self-discipline and selfdiscipline again is the basic spirit of Kant’s normative turn,interpretive and normative are the legitimacy basis of transcendental demonstration of congenital comprehensive judgment,and the unity of normative vocabulary and modal vocabulary is the effective condition of congenital comprehensive judgment.

关 键 词：康德哲学 规范性 布兰顿 理性立法 理性自律 

分 类 号：B15[哲学宗教—世界哲学]