检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈嫣然 梁正 赵庆柏 黄宇 李松清 于全磊 周治金[1] CHEN Yanran;LIANG Zheng;ZHAO Qingbai;Huang Yu;LI Songqing;YU Quanlei;ZHOU Zhijin(Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior(CCNU),Ministry of Education,School of Psychology,Central China Normal University,Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province,Wuhan 430079,China;College of Electronic Engineering,Naval University of Engineering,Wuhan 430034,China)
机构地区:[1]青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,华中师范大学心理学院,湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室,武汉430079 [2]海军工程大学电子工程学院,武汉430079
出 处:《心理学报》2022年第8期881-891,共11页Acta Psychologica Sinica
基 金:华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(CCNU19TD019,CCNU19ZN022)资助。
摘 要:通过描绘发散性思维测验(物品多用途,AUT)中答案生成在累积函数和语义相似性等一系列参数上的量化特征,揭示创造性思维的语义搜索过程。结果发现:(1)新颖AUT条件中,语义搜索呈现与自由联想类似的负加速特点,但搜索速度较寻常AUT条件更慢。(2)新颖AUT条件中所生成的答案与题目(即物品)均具有较低的语义相似性,且显著小于寻常AUT条件。(3)新颖AUT条件中生成的答案比寻常AUT条件表现出显著更低的聚类程度,其中可聚类答案和未聚类答案与题目的语义相似度均较低,且不存在显著差异,二者在新颖性上也不存在显著差异。以上结果说明了创造性思维的语义信息搜索过程具有与自由联想类似的激活扩散特征,但总体搜索速度较慢。新颖性要求使得个体在最初搜索时便开始摆脱题目的语义限制而进行远距离搜索(避免就近搜索),并倾向于在每个语义场中只生成一个答案(避免局部搜索),但也可能会在远离题目的语义场中生成多个同类别答案。The semantic search during creative thinking refers to the activation process of semantic information in long-term memory involved in creative activities.Influential theory has posited that the semantic activation process in free recall shows spreading activation within semantic networks and is characterized by negative acceleration and clustering.Unlike the free recall,it is necessary to suppress the dominant response and to activate novel and distant information during creative thinking.Therefore,one might expect different semantic search processes during creative thinking,but such a hypothesis has not yet been directly tested.To explore the semantic search process during creative thinking,the present study described the quantitative dynamic characteristics of answer generation in a divergent thinking test using a series of parameters,such as cumulative response distribution and semantic similarity.The experiment employed a within-subject design with the task type(novel V.S.normal)as the independent variable.The experiment included two versions of alternative uses task(AUT):novel and normal AUT.In the novel AUT,participants were asked to report novel and valid uses for the daily-life items presented on the screen as many as possible,while in the normal AUT they were only asked to think of valid uses for objects as many as possible.During the experiment,participants completed two normal AUTs,followed by two novel AUTs.Each AUT lasted for three minutes.The novelty of responses and semantic similarity of responses were scored by participants themselves.The time function of the cumulative number of responses was fitted by the hyperbolic function,and clustering analysis was conducted based on the semantic similarity of responses.The results showed that:(1)The cumulative response distribution in the novel AUT condition were negatively accelerating similar to semantic search during free recall,but the search speed in the novel AUT condition was slower than that of the normal AUT condition.(2)In the novel AUT condition
分 类 号:B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46