理智与行动:一种温和版本的理智论进路  

Intelligence and Action:A Moderate Version of the Intellectualistic Approach

作　　者：周斡旋 陈磊[1] ZHOU Wo-xuan;CHEN Lei(School of Philosophy,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学哲学学院,北京100875

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2022年第6期16-21,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

摘　　要：吉尔伯特·赖尔通过无穷后退论证反驳理智论者。为了捍卫理智论,斯坦利与威廉姆森对这一论证进行了重构,突出了行为的意向性特征。然而,他们的辩护存在诸多困难。其实可以借助相关条件,构造一种温和版本的理智论,来调和它与反理智论之间的冲突,它一方面不会导致无穷后退,另一方面刻画了两种知识的必然联系。它将如是之知作为如何之知的证据来源,提出了判断行为是否理智的标准,为解决理智行为与知识之间关系的难题提供新的方向。Ryle refuted intellectualists through the Regress Argument.To defend intellectualism,Stanley and Williamson reconstructed this argument and highlighted the intentionality of intellectual actions.However,their defence had many difficulties.We put forward a moderate version of intellectualism to reconcile the conflict between intellectualism and anti-intellectualism.It portrays the inherent connection between two kinds of knowledge but not leads to a vicious regress.We consider knowing that as the evidence of knowing how,thus propose a criterion for judging whether an action is intellectual and provides a new direction for solving the problem of the relationship between intellectual action and knowledge.

关 键 词：赖尔 理智论 无穷后退论证 如是之知 如何之知 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]