系统理论中系统动力学方法论的困境、问题与未来--基于经典定性与定量方法的批判视角  

The Dilemma,Problems and Future of System Dynamics Methodology--Critical Perspective Based on Classical Qualitative and Quantitative Methods

作　　者：段哲哲 艾健 秦强 DUAN Zhe-zhe;AI Jian;QIN Qiang(Institute of Urban Governance,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518128,China;Business School,Taiwan Chengchi University,Taipei 116011,China;School of Public Management,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)

机构地区：[1]深圳大学城市治理研究院,广东深圳518128 [2]台湾政治大学商学院,中国台湾台北116011 [3]清华大学公共管理学院,北京100084

出　　处：《系统科学学报》2022年第2期30-34,共5页Chinese Journal of Systems Science

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目(17CZZ028);广东省哲学社会规划党史特别委托项目(GD20TW05-03);2020年广东省高校党建研究课题(2020BK035);深圳大学高水平建设“基层干部选贤任能体制实践、效果与优化研究”课题(2110721)。

摘　　要：系统动力学是政策实验室的一种重要方法论,是一种综合了定性、定量研究方法的交叉复杂大系统,却受到了经典定性与定量方法的批判。本研究在梳理经典定性学者和定量学者对其批判的内容基础上,使用了典范视角分析了系统动力学受到批评的原因,提出系统动力学方法要与其他方法融合、领域内学者要与其他学者合作、平衡学术与实务导向的建议。System dynamics is an important methodology of the policy laboratory(decision theater),and it is a large and complex system that integrates qualitative and quantitative research methods,which has been criticized by qualitative and quantitative methods.This study combs the content and perspectives of classical qualitative and quantitative scholars,and uses the canonical perspective to analyze the reasons for the criticism of system dynamics.It is proposed that system dynamics methods should be integrated with other methods,and scholars in the field should be integrated with other scholars Cooperation,balanced academic and practice-oriented.

关 键 词：SD方法论 定性方法 定量方法 混合方法 

分 类 号：N941[自然科学总论—系统科学]