检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张珣[1] 柳晓金 郑立恒[1] 周雪芹 李倩[1] 郑浩[3] ZHANG Xun;LIU Xiao-jin;ZHENG Li-heng;ZHOU Xue-qin;LI Qian;ZHENG Hao(Clinical Laboratory of Hebei Provincial Chest Hospital,Shijiazhuang,Hebei 050041,China;Fever Clinic of Hebei Provincial Chest Hospital,Shijiazhuang,Hebei 050041,China;Functional Division of Hebei Provincial Chest Hospital,Shijiazhuang,Hebei 050041,China)
机构地区:[1]河北省胸科医院检验科,河北石家庄050041 [2]河北省胸科医院发热门诊,河北石家庄050041 [3]河北省胸科医院功能科,河北石家庄050041
出 处:《中国热带医学》2022年第5期454-457,共4页China Tropical Medicine
摘 要:目的 建立改良抗酸染色法,并与离心涂片法和GENEN Xpert相比较,探讨改良抗酸染色法在结核性胸膜炎诊断中的应用价值。方法 应用改良抗酸染色法、离心涂片法、GENEN Xpert同时对84份临床诊断为结核性胸膜炎的胸腔积液标本进行检测,其中,胸腔积液多核细胞>50%的15例(多核为主组),多核细胞<50%的69例(单核为主组)。结果 84例胸腔积液改良抗酸染色法、离心涂片法、GENEN Xpert的阳性率分别为29.8%(25/84)、7.1%(6/84)、32.1%(27/84)。15例多核为主组改良抗酸染色法、离心涂片法、GENEN Xpert的阳性率分别为80.0%(12/15)、26.7%(4/15)、86.7%(13/15),69例单核为主组改良抗酸染色法、离心涂片法、GENEN Xpert的阳性率分别为18.8%(13/69)、2.9%(2/69)、20.2%(14/69),改良抗酸染色法与GENEN Xpert阳性率均高,比较差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=0.111,P>0.05),改良抗酸染色法阳性率明显高于离心涂片法,比较差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=14.28,P<0.05)。结论 改良抗酸染色法、离心涂片法、GENEN Xpert三种方法中,综合来说改良抗酸染色法诊断结核性胸膜炎阳性率高,经济、快速、简便,敏感性、特异性高,值得临床推广应用。ObjectiveWe aimed to establish an improved acid-fast staining method and compare it with the centrifugal smear method and GENEN Xpert to explore the application value of the improved acid-fast staining method in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy.Methods pleurisy were examined by improved Ziehl-Neelsen stain, centrifugation smear and Genen Xpert. Among them, 15 cases with polynuclear cell more than 50% in hydrothorax(polynuclear group), and 69 cases with polynuclear cell lower than 50%(mononuclear group).Results Xpert were 29.8%(25/84), 7.1%(6/84) and 32.1%(27/84), respectively. The positive rates for polynuclear group were 80.0%(12/15), 26.7%(4/15) and 86.7%(13/15), respectively. And the positive rates for mononuclear group were 18.8%(13/69), 2.9%(2/69) and 20.2%(14/69), respectively. There was no significant difference between the positive rate of improved ZiehlNeelsen stain method and that of GENE Xpert method(χ^(2)=0.111,P>0.05). The positive rate of improved Ziehl-Neelsen stain was higher than that of Centrifugation smear(χ^(2)=14.28,P<0.05).ConclusionAmong the three methods of modified acid-fast staining method, centrifugation smear and GENEN Xpert, the improved Ziehl-Neelsen stain method has high positive rate in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. It is economical and rapid, and worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49