检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马迪倩[1] Ma Diqian
机构地区:[1]南开大学图书馆
出 处:《图书馆学研究》2022年第4期60-68,共9页Research on Library Science
基 金:国家社科基金项目“面向新时代高等教育内涵式发展的高校图书馆服务成效与贡献度测评研究”(项目编号:21BTQ007)的研究成果之一。
摘 要:对阅读推广开展成效评估是实现其价值、促进其持续发展的有效管理手段和工具。以用户体验为测量尺度,揭示图书馆投入与用户收益不平衡的症结,可有效增加活动满意度,切实提升推广成效。以用户体验理论为基石并吸纳图书馆评估、教育传播学、用户行为学理论,以大学生体验为测度对象,采用层次分析法构建高校图书馆阅读推广成效评估三级模型,包括产品、用户、情境3个一级指标,可用性、美感、认知等7个二级指标以及传播者、阅读内容、活动设计等21个三级指标。为论证模型是否切实可行,对由模型演变而来的量表进行信效度检验,间接证实模型的有效性,为丰富图书馆服务成效评估体系提供新的理论依据和实践参考。Evaluating the effectiveness of reading promotion is an effective management tool and instrument to realize its value and promote sustainable development.Using user experience as a measure to reveal the crux of the imbalance between library investment and user benefits can effectively increase activity satisfaction and enhance the effectiveness of promotion.Taking user experience theory as the cornerstone and incorporating library evaluation, educational communication and user behavior theories, we use hierarchical analysis to build a three-level model for evaluating the effectiveness of reading promotion in university libraries, including three primary indicators of product, user and situation, and seven secondary indicators, such as usability, aesthetics and perception, and 21 tertiary indicators, such as communicators, reading content and activity design.In order to prove whether the model is practical and feasible, the reliability and validity of the scale evolved from the model is tested to indirectly confirm the validity of the model and provide a new theoretical basis and practical reference for enriching the library service effectiveness assessment system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43