《绿窗新话》与《类说》的文本关系及其学术意义  

Textual Relations and the Academic Value of Luchuang Xinhua and Lei Shuo

作　　者：关静 Guan Jing

机构地区：[1]南开大学文学院,天津300071

出　　处：《南开学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第4期183-192,共10页Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2021M691675);南开大学文科发展基金青年项目(ZB22BZ0302)。

摘　　要：《绿窗新话》一书因其形式、内容方面的特性,兼与说话伎艺的关联,向为学界所重。前贤研究多围绕《绿窗新话》的编纂目的、文献来源、文本生成、功能价值等问题展开,又因材料缺乏,难成定论。在此背景下,从《绿窗新话》的文本来源出发探讨相关问题,或可另辟蹊径。曾慥所编《类说》与《绿窗新话》之间存在密切的文本关系,因二书通行本均“殊失原貌”,加之《绿窗新话》的出处误导,以及皇都风月主人者的有意改动,这一关系甚少为学界所知。通过对二书条目的细致比对,可考证出《绿窗新话》共有六十余个条目曾引用《类说》,包括照抄《类说》、节略《类说》、参考《类说》三种类型。The book Luchuang Xinhua(绿窗新话)has been highly valued by scholars due to its features in forms and content,as well as its connection with speaking skills.Most of the preceding studies concerning the book had focused on its compiling objectives,literature origins,textual creation,functional value,and other issues.Nevertheless,consensus has not been reached about them due to a lack of resources.Therefore,related questions about the book requires further exploration from its textual origin.The book Lei Shuo(类说)compiled by Zeng Zao is closely connected to Luchuang Xinhua in terms of textual relationship,however such kinds of connection has attracted little attention from academic circles.By comparing the items of the two books in detail,it has been discovered that over sixty items in Luchuang Xinhua have been cited from Lei Shuo,including copying,summarizing and referring to parts Qi Lei Shuo.

关 键 词：《绿窗新话》 《类说》 《绣谷春容》 文本关系 

分 类 号：I207.41[文学—中国文学]