检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴君霞[1] 蒋敬[1] 周用武[1] WU Junxia;JIANG Jing;ZHOU Yongwu(Nanjing Forest Police College,Nanjing 210046,China)
机构地区:[1]南京森林警察学院,南京210046
出 处:《林业资源管理》2022年第3期25-30,共6页Forest Resources Management
基 金:2020年司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目“野生动物刑事案件证明问题研究”(20SFB4044)。
摘 要:在野生动物刑事案件中,鉴定是判别动物物种的重要方法。但在多种因素的影响下,当前司法实践中存在“有案必鉴”的鉴定泛化倾向。鉴定泛化可能造成诸多负面后果。破解鉴定泛化的路径在于:要认识到当前的动物物种鉴定存在错误风险,打破鉴定意见因科学而正确的迷思;正确理解刑事案件中追求真相的限度,合理划分鉴定与鉴定替代方法的适用范围;合理组织合议庭,降低法官的司法责任风险,提高司法裁决的公信力。In wildlife criminal cases,identification is an important method to identify animal species.However,under the influence of various factors,there is a tendency of over-identification that"every case must be identified"in the current judicial practice.Over-identification may lead to many negative consequences.The way to crack over-identification lies in:recognizing the risk of errors in the current identification of animal species,and breaking the myth that expert opinions are scientifically correct;correctly understanding the limits of the pursuit of truth in criminal cases,and reasonably dividing the application scope of identification and identification’s alternatives;reasonably organizing collegial panels to reduce the risk of judges’judicial liability and improve the credibility of judicial decisions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.121.183