检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李耿 张艺瀚 Li Geng;Zhang Yihan(Sports College of Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410000,Hunan,China)
出 处:《体育科技文献通报》2022年第7期38-41,150,共5页Bulletin of Sport Science & Technology
基 金:教育部高等教育司研究项目(项目编号:202102389009);湖南省教育厅科学研究项目(项目编号:21A0061)。
摘 要:目的:通过对比分析羽毛球21分制与11分制对羽毛球男子单打运动员造成的影响,探寻11分制的显著特点,为判断我国男子单打运动员技战术的发展趋势提供一定启示。本研究从运动训练学角度出发,利用文献资料法、专家访谈法、数理统计法、对比分析法等研究方法,对国际羽联赛事和中国羽超联赛中男子运动员各方面数据进行比较分析和深入研究。结果表明:①前场已成为男单运动员争夺的主要区域;②男子单打项目比赛的平均时长缩短;③比赛时间可预见性的缩短促使双方在开局阶段进入抢分状态;④直接得分是最主要的得分来源。This paper presents a comparative study of the impact on men’s singles players between the 21 points per goal-scoring system and the 11 points per goal-scoring system.It also shares notable features of the 11 points per goal-scoring system that might shed some light on the development trend of China men’s singles players’techniques and tactics.[Methods/Process]From the perspective of theories of sports training,an in-depth study is carried out on male players’data from the International Badminton League events and the Chinese Badminton Super League events,by using the methods of literature review,expert interviews,mathematical statistics and comparative analysis.[Results/Conclusions]The findings are as follows.(a)The front court has become the main part of court for men’s singles athletes to compete for scoring;(b)The average time duration of a men’s singles event has become shorter;(c)The predictability of shorter duration has prompted both sides for quick scoring right from the start of a match;(d)Direct scores contribute to the majority of scores.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28