多区模型模拟工具的对比研究  

Comparative study of simulation tools for multi-zone model

作　　者：郭嘉闽 刘俊杰[1] 涂岱昕 Guo Jiamin;Liu Junjie;Tu Daixin(Tianjin University,Tianjin;Tianjin University Research Institute of Architectural Design and Urban Planning Co.,Ltd.,Tianjin)

机构地区：[1]天津大学,天津300072 [2]天津大学建筑设计规划研究总院有限公司,天津

出　　处：《暖通空调》2022年第8期36-43,共8页Heating Ventilating & Air Conditioning

基　　金：国家重点研发计划资助项目“降低洁净空调系统输配和冷热源能耗的关键技术与设备研发”(编号:2018YFC0705202)。

摘　　要：各区域间形成定向气流是避免污染物威胁室内外人员健康的重要措施,利用多区模型可在建筑设计阶段快速预测建筑内多房间的气流流向,为实际工程提供参考。目前实现多区模拟的工具多样化,本文将模拟工具分为传统型多区模拟工具和多领域集成型模拟工具,并对二者进行了总结和对比。结果表明,后者继承和发展了前者的多区模型,且可实现更加真实的通风系统模拟,此外,后者因可扩展性好,较集成后的传统型工具可适用的研究范围更广。因此本文认为多领域集成型模拟工具为未来多区模拟的首选工具。Making the directional airflows between zones is an efficacious measure to avoid contaminants threatening the health of people indoors and outdoors. Using the multi-zone model can predict the airflow in the whole building at the design phase, which can provide suggestions for actual engineering. At present, there are many tools to implement multi-zone simulation. The simulation tools are divided into traditional multi-zone simulation tools and multi-domain integration simulation tools, and they are summarized and compared in this study. The results show that the latter inherits and develops the multi-zone model of the former, and can simulate a more realistic ventilation system. In addition, because of its scalability, the latter can be applied to widely research fields. Therefore, the multi-domain integration simulation tool is considered to be a suitable multi-zone simulation tool in the future in this study.

关 键 词：多区模型 软件对比 气流模拟 传染病医院 生物实验室 

分 类 号：TU83[建筑科学—供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程]