检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:庞金友[1] 赵西亚 Pang Jinyou;Zhao Xiya
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学政治与公共管理学院,北京100088
出 处:《学海》2022年第4期86-95,共10页Academia Bimestris
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目“当代西方国家政治极化的源起与影响研究”(项目号:21AZZ002)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:后现代主义价值革命的发展伴随着政治信任的下降,一些研究者乐观地将信任下降解释为有益于民主政治发展的政治怀疑。然而现实显现的是另外一幅图景:在经济和文化的双重挤压下,物质主义者的“文化反冲”狂潮席卷而来,其矛头直指政府;后物质主义者的民粹情绪被激发,无节制的民主价值追求使其走向反精英和反体制。两大阵营秉持迥然不同的价值观念,却同时陷入政治不信任的泥沼。这一政治信任危机给当代美国政治埋下了重大隐患,若想保持怀疑精神以坚守民主,只能在价值观的对立中不断寻求共识性原则而不是简单争论对错输赢。The value revolution of postmodernization accompanied the decline in political trust.Some researchers interpret this change optimistically as a kind of political scepticism that beneficial to the development of democracy.However,the reality shows another prospect:under the squeeze of economy and culture,the tide of“cultural backlash”of materialists has swept through,and its spearhead is directed at the government;at the same time,the populist sentiment of postmaterialists was stimulated,and the unrestrained pursuit of democratic values made them move towards anti-elitism and anti-system.Although the two camps uphold very different values,they are mired in political distrust at the same time.The crisis of political trust is a major hidden danger of contemporary American democratic politics.If Americans want to maintain the spirit of skepticism and adhere to democracy,they can only constantly seek the principle of consensus in the opposition between the two values rather than simply arguing about right and wrong.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117