《后山诗话》考辨  

Textual Research into Houshan’s Remarks on Poetry

作　　者：周子翼[1] ZHOU Zi-yi(School of Humanities,Nanchang University,Nanchang 330031,China)

机构地区：[1]南昌大学人文学院,江西南昌330031

出　　处：《海南大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2022年第4期150-157,共8页Journal of Hainan University （Humanities & Social Sciences）

摘　　要：《后山诗话》在诗话史上具有特别的意义,但其作者一直为后世所质疑,需要予以考辨。虽然一般人认为《后山诗话》的作者是陈师道,但所提供的依据并非确凿证据。综考全书内容与宋代其他诗话相关引录,可知其中部分文字有衍有讹,一些本属作者自己的言论混为他人,由此推断《后山诗话》乃是陈师道未能定稿的著作。宋代大多诗话的创作本有资闲谈、助戏谑的性质,故在学术研究中使用其材料时应该慎重,对引述内容有时需要作充分论证。Houshan’s Remarks on Poetry has special significance in the history of poetry comments, but its author has been questioned by later generations and needs to be examined. Although it is generally believed that the author of Houshan ’s Remarks on Poetry is Chen Shidao, the basis provided is not conclusive evidence. A comprehensive examination of the contents of the book and other quotations related to the poetry of the Song Dynasty shows that some of the words have been corrupted, and some of the author’s own words are mixed with others. Therefore, it can be inferred that Houshan’s Remarks on Poetry is the works that Chen Shidao failed to finalize. Since most of the poems in the Song Dynasty were created with the nature of chatting and joking, it should be cautious when it comes to the use of their materials in academic research, and sometimes the quoted contents should be demonstrated adequately.

关 键 词：后山诗话 陈师道 考辨 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]