检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:武庆圆 杨智杰 张雪雯 朱侯 Wu Qingyuan;Yang Zhijie;Zhang Xuewen;Zhu Hou(School of Internet Finance and Information Engineering,Guangdong University of Finance,Guangzhou 510521,China;School of Computer Science and Engineering,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China;School of Information Management,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China)
机构地区:[1]广东金融学院互联网金融与信息工程学院,广东广州510521 [2]中山大学计算机学院,广东广州510275 [3]中山大学信息管理学院,广东广州510275
出 处:《科技管理研究》2022年第13期123-130,共8页Science and Technology Management Research
基 金:广东省哲学社会科学规划青年基金项目“基于多维深层专利引用网络的技术演进路径识别研究”(GD19YTS02)。
摘 要:以新能源汽车产业专利数据为例,将专利被引用频次、同族数量作为衡量专利原始效用的主要指标,并通过两步骤的高效用关联规则挖掘算法,获得专利权人的高效用合作项集,以发现高价值的技术创新合作团队。实证表明,将专利价值的评价模型与高效用关联规则挖掘方法相结合,能够极大提升技术创新合作团队发现的召回率。此外,与传统关联规则挖掘方法相比,基于高效用关联规则获得的高价值团队在分布数量、分布类型等方面呈现明显优势。Taking the patent data in the new energy vehicle industry as an example,the frequency of patent citation and the number of the same family were taken as the main indicators to measure the original utility of the patent.Using the two-steps effective utility association rule mining,both cooperative item sets of patentees with effective utilities and high-value technique innovation cooperative teams were mined.Experiments indicated that the recall rate of discovering technique innovation cooperative teams was enhanced largely by combining the patent value evaluation model with the effective utility association rule mining.Furthermore,in terms of distribution quantity and distribution type,the high-value teams identified by the effective utility association rule mining showed obvious advantages when compared with the classical association rule mining.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249