检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李茜 付玉明[1] Li Qian;Fu Yuming
机构地区:[1]西北政法大学刑事法学院
出 处:《医学与法学》2022年第4期74-79,共6页Medicine and Jurisprudence
摘 要:我国现行法律对代孕行为的规制存在位阶低、效力局限且主体有限等问题;“代孕行为”,应在明确概念和其外延的基础上予以类型化区分,严格界分代孕者的代孕行为与代孕参与人的代孕前置行为。前者从刑法保护目的、个人权益保护,及从刑法体系一致性的考量上,均缺乏刑事不法性。后者具有刑事规制可行性与必要性,故有效治理应依赖于刑法来对之规制,以此达到对代孕行为的一般预防的目的。There are problems such as low rank, limited effectiveness and limited subjects in the regulation of surrogacy by the current laws in China. Surrogacy should be differentiated by type on the basis of clarifying its concept and scope, and strictly distinguish the surrogacy behavior of the surrogate from the surrogacy pre-pregnancy behavior of the surrogate participants. The former lacks criminal illegality in terms of the protection purpose of criminal law, the protection of personal rights and the consistency of the criminal law system. The latter has the feasibility and necessity of criminal regulation. The effective governance of surrogacy should rely on the regulation of criminal law,so as to achieve the purpose of general prevention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170