检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙忆 SUN Yi
机构地区:[1]中共中央党校(国家行政学院)国际战略研究院,北京100091
出 处:《东北亚论坛》2022年第4期98-113,128,共17页Northeast Asia Forum
基 金:2021年度中央党校(国家行政学院)校级科研项目(2021QN043)。
摘 要:推进亚太区域经济一体化是大多数亚太经济体长久以来共同的意愿与目标,CPTPP和RCEP的相继签署与生效为这一目标的实现提供了不同的路径方案。CPTPP与RCEP在制度主导力量、规则水平、规则制定模式等方面存在明显差异,二者之间互动关系的变化可能使得未来亚太区域经济一体化呈现出制度替代、制度竞争、制度融合三种不同的潜在图景。长期来看,CPTPP和RCEP具备了能够实现制度融合的有利条件,二者不仅在高标准规则目标上具有一致性,诸多制度重叠成员国还为两大制度搭建了融合的桥梁,而且新冠肺炎疫情客观上也为制度融合提供了时机。在推动地区制度融合、加速亚太区域经济一体化进程中,中国也将基于本国经济实力及地区网络地位等情况,发挥更加积极的作用并主动作出更大贡献。Promoting economic integration in the Asia-Pacific area has long been the common aspiration and goal of most AsiaPacific economies.The successive signing and entry into force of CPTPP and RCEP have provided different paths for the realization of such goal.It is obvious that CPTPP and RCEP are different in terms of leading power,level of rules,and mode of rule-making.Diverse interaction between CPTPP and RCEP probably leads to three potential scenarios in the future:institutional substitution,institutional competition,and institutional integration.In the long run,CPTPP and RCEP have favorable conditions to achieve institutional integration.Not only do they have similar objectives to practice high-standard rules,but overlapping membership helps build a bridge for the integration of these two FTAs;besides,COVID-19 pandemic objectively provides an opportunity for the integration.In promoting institutional integration as well as accelerating the process of economic integration in the Asia-Pacific area,China will play a more active role and make greater contributions based on its own economic strength and regional network status.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249