基于COSMIN方法的环境恢复性量表测量性能系统评价  

A Systematic Review on Measurement Properties of Environmental Restorativeness Scales Based on the COSMIN Method

作　　者：刘畅 李树华[2] LIU Chang;LI Shuhua

机构地区：[1]福建农林大学艺术学院园林学院(合署),福州350002 [2]清华大学建筑学院,北京100084

出　　处：《中国园林》2022年第7期62-67,共6页Chinese Landscape Architecture

基　　金：国家自然科学基金面上项目“基于高压人群身心健康的工作环境绿色空间体系研究”(编号51978364);福建省社会科学规划项目“基于计算机视觉的城市绿道宜跑品质评价方法研究”(编号FJ2021C069);福建省中青年教师教育科研项目“大学校园道路景观恢复性品质关联物质空间特征研究”(编号JAS21067)共同资助。

摘　　要：遵循“基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准”(COSMIN),对14个基于注意力恢复理论中恢复性四因素发展的自评式环境恢复性量表的测量性能进行系统评价,形成推荐等级并讨论基于研究情境的量表决策路径。14个量表在结构效度、内部一致性、稳定性和跨文化效度方面整体表现一般,并普遍缺乏内容效度研究。在不考虑间接风险的条件下,仅RCS达到直接推荐等级,PRCS-C与PRS-23(CH)未达到推荐等级,其余11个量表归为暂时推荐等级,总体质量欠佳,亟须加强内容效度研究、规范研究方法、深化理论模型。In compliance with Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instrument(COSMIN),the measurement properties of 14 self-rating environmental restorativeness scales developed from the 4 restorativeness factors of attention restoration theory are systematically reviewed,the recommendation levels for each scale are summarized,and scale decision-making paths for different research situations are discussed.The included 14 scales perform generally in terms of structural validity,internal consistency,reliability,and crosscultural validity,while there is a common lack of content validity study.Without taking indirectness into account,only RCS reaches direct recommendation level,PRS-23(CH)and PRCS-C are out of recommendation,and the remaining 11 scales are temporarily recommended.Due to the unsatisfied overall quality,it is urgent to strengthen content validity research,standardize research methods,and deepen theoretical model.

关 键 词：风景园林 环境恢复性量表 测量性能 系统评价 COSMIN方法 

分 类 号：TU986[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]