检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Efrat Hadas Uri Mingelgrin Pinchas Fine
机构地区:[1]Investment Financing Department,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development,68 Hamakabim Road,P.O.Box 15159,7505101 Rishon LeZion,Israel [2]Agricultural Research Organization,Volcani Center,Institute of Soils,Water and Environmental Sciences,68 Hamakabim Road,P.O.Box 15159,7505101 Rishon LeZion,Israel
出 处:《International Journal of Coal Science & Technology》2021年第5期1099-1107,共9页国际煤炭科学技术学报(英文)
基 金:This work was funded by the Israel National Coal Ash Board(INCAB)Grant#39477.The authors wish to express their deep gratitude to the late Mr.Omri Lulav,Head of the INCAB.
摘 要:A tool for calculating the economic and environmental impacts of the use of byproducts of industrial processes that can substitute for perishable resources was presented.This was exemplified by fly ash(the fine fraction of ash originating from coal burned to generate electricity and collected by filtering exhaust gases leaving the furnace),added to soil as a component of sewage sludge stabilized with fly ash and lime(NVS).Application to soil of NVS has potential agricultural and environmental advantages and disadvantages.The costs and benefits of such application were calculated using both a database and expert opinions.The calculations assumed a representative assemblage of soils and crops,with weights assigned to each crop type and soil characteristic.The annual weighted benefits(additional income for the farmer)and costs per hectare reached 324$/ha and 131$/ha respectively.Major potential benefits include:Chemical fertilizer replacement,159$/ha;Improvement to the soil’s physical properties,75$/ha;Supply of vital trace elements,33$/ha.Major potential costs were:Regulatory limitations on marketing of crops pending proof of absence of risk of heavy metals or radionuclides accumulation in these crops,(17$/ha and 36$/ha respectively);Application and incorporation cost,50$/ha.The presented estimates of the costs and benefits refer to the array of soils and conditions typical to Israel.It is possible to maximize potential benefits by applying fly ash only to the most suitable agricultural soils while improper use of fly ash will increase the costs incurred from its use.
关 键 词:Byproducts recycling Cost-benefit analysis Fly ash LIMING Sewage sludge
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.180.227