检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡娟[1] HU Juan(Department of Hematology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College,Bengbu 233000,China)
机构地区:[1]蚌埠医学院第一附属医院血液科,蚌埠233000
出 处:《世界睡眠医学杂志》2022年第6期1147-1149,共3页World Journal of Sleep Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察系统护理干预对急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者情绪、生命质量和睡眠质量的影响。方法:选取2019年6月至2021年3月蚌埠医学院第一附属医院收治的ALL患者84例作为研究对象,按照抽签法随机分成对照组与观察组,每组42例。给予对照组患者常规护理,给予观察组患者系统护理干预。观察比较2组患者焦虑自评量表(SAS)及抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、欧洲癌症治疗研究组织(EORTC)的生命质量测定量表(QLQ-C30)评分和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评分。结果:护理前,2组患者SAS评分、SDS评分及PSQI评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);护理后,2组患者SAS评分、SDS评分及PSQI评分均下降,且观察组SAS评分、SDS评分、PSQI评分低于对照组,2组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);护理前,2组各项QLQ-C30评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);护理后,2组患者QLQ-C30各项评分均提高,且观察组QLQ-C30各维度评分高于对照组,2组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论:系统护理干预对急性淋巴细胞白血病患者有很好的效果,可改善其情绪,提高其睡眠质量和生命质量,建议推广应用。Objective:To evaluate and analyze the effects of systematic nursing intervention on mood,quality of life and sleep quality of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL).Methods:A total of 84 Patients with ALL who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College from June 2019 to March 2021 were included in the study sample.The samples were divided into control group and observation group according to the method of drawing lots,with 42 patients in each group.Routine nursing was given to the control group and systematic nursing intervention was given to the observation group.In terms of patients′emotional evaluation,Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS)and Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS)scales were used to analyze patients′emotional states before and after nursing.Quality of Life Questionnare-Core 30(QLQ-C30)scale of The European O-rganization for Reasearch and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC)was used to evaluate the quality of life of patients before and after nursing.In the evaluation of patients′sleep quality,Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI)was used to compare the changes of sleep quality before and after nursing.Results:Before nursing,there was no significant difference in SAS,SDS and PSQI scores between the two groups(P s>0.05).After nursing,SAS,SDS and PSQI scores of the two groups decreased,and SAS,SDS and PSQI scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group(P s<0.05).Observation group of patients with depression and anxiety improved more ideal mood,sleep quality significantly improved.At the same time,in terms of quality of life,there was no significant difference between the two groups of quality of life index scores before nursing(P s>0.05).After nursing,the scores of all indicators of quality of life in the two groups increased,and the scores of all dimensions of quality of life in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(P s<0.05),and the quality of life in the observation group was better.Conclusion:Systematic nursing inter
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222