后人文主义身份想象与媒介技术的文学表征  

Posthumanism Identity Imagination and Literary Representation of Media Technology

作　　者：姚富瑞 Yao Furui(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China)

机构地区：[1]兰州大学文学院,甘肃兰州730000

出　　处：《西北民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第4期166-173,共8页Journal of Northwest Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“丝路审美文化中外互通问题研究”(项目编号:17ZDA272);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“‘一带一路’背景下兰州城市审美文化研究”(项目编号:2020jbkyzy002)。

摘　　要：对人与技术关系的乌托邦与反乌托邦式的文学描绘,是基于一种传统上的技术二分法,即技术工具论与技术决定论,它们表面上是一种明显对立,但实质上却体现了一种技术辩证法。在以法兰克福学派为主要代表的思想家所勾勒的启蒙辩证法框架内,机械复制时代的工具理性逐渐演变成技术理性,并通过文学艺术作品表征出来。即使是政治经济文化发展与技术密不可分的信息化时代,在某种程度上表现出来的仍然是一种数字辩证法的逻辑。因此,要摆脱这种循环,就需要用非人本主义和非工具性的术语重新概念化人类的身份和技术,一种将技术看作是生成或创造进程的技术自我创生视角,启发着我们去想象和探索一种非人本主义的后人文主义。The utopian and dystopian literary description of the relationship between human and technology is based on a traditional technological dichotomy,namely technological instrumentalism and technological determinism theory,which are obviously opposites on the surface,but essentially embody a dialectics of technology.In the framework of enlightenment dialectics outlined by the thinkers mainly represented by the Frankfurt School,the instrumental rationality in the era of mechanical reproduction has gradually evolved into technical rationality,and has been represented through literary and art works.Even in the information age,when the development of politics,economy and culture is closely related to technology,it is still a kind of logic of digital dialectics to some extent.Thus,getting out of this cycle requires the re-conceptualization of human identity and technology in non-humanist and non-instrumental terms,the perspective of technology autopoiesis,which regards technology as a process of generation or creation,inspires us to imagine and explore a posthumanism that is not humanist.

关 键 词：后人类 技术辩证法 技术自我创生 后人文主义身份 文学表征 

分 类 号：I209[文学—中国文学]