检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:后尚 HOU Shang(Guangdong Boyi Architectural Design Institute Changsha Branch,Changsha 410000,China)
机构地区:[1]广东博意建筑设计院长沙分院,长沙410000
出 处:《价值工程》2022年第24期103-105,共3页Value Engineering
摘 要:当前很多住宅小区都采取高低配的设置,一类高层住宅搭配二类高层住宅及部分多层叠墅。导致消火栓系统分区存在多种的分区方式,各种分区方式都有各自的优缺点。本论文针对某高低配住宅小区工程实例,进行了三种常见室内消火栓系统分区方案,就安全可靠性、系统复杂程度、经济性、成本力进行比较,最终确定了最经济合理适用的室内消火栓系统分区实施方案。At present,many residential quarters have adopted a high-low distribution setting,first-class high-rise residential building matched with second-class high-rise residential building and some multi-storey villas.As a result,there are various partitioning methods for the fire hydrant system,and each partitioning method has its own advantages and disadvantages.In this paper,aiming at an example of a residential area with high and low distribution,three common partition schemes for indoor fire hydrant systems are carried out,and the safety and reliability,system complexity,economy and cost are compared,and finally the most economical and reasonable partition implementation plan of indoor fire hydrant system is determined.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15