检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张留华[1] ZHANG Liu-hua(Department of Philosophy,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China)
出 处:《山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2022年第4期19-26,共8页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“逻辑词汇的历史演进与哲学问题研究”(20&ZD046)。
摘 要:现代经典逻辑中,可以找到对于联结词意义的一种精确刻画。然而,随着当代逻辑多元一体化格局的出现,一个难题是:由于很难确定联结词意义的个体化条件,我们无法得知哪一种逻辑刻画才抓到了联结词的真实意义,就像我们不知道哪一种逻辑理论才是唯一正确的一样。一种基于联结词意义的逻辑多元论,不仅可以解释当代多元化的逻辑理论何以出现,又可以阐明当代学者关于联结词意义的诸多焦虑如何形成又何以消除。Modern classical logic is supposed to give a precise characterization of the meaning of connectives.However,as a plethora of alternative logics come out,one issue that results in is:Owing to much difficulty in deciding on the individuating condition of meaning,it is as hard to know which logic captures the adequate meaning of connectives as to determine which logical theory is correct.A new version of logical pluralism is proposed in this paper,which can not only explain why so many logical theories arise,but also clarify a possible way in which contemporary anxiety over meaning of logical connectives can appear and disappear.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200