“台湾地区认同”的复合定义及演变由来:基于历史制度主义的分析  

The Composite Definition and Evolution of “Taiwan Identity”:Analysis Based on Historical Institutionalism

作　　者：卞梁 马津润 Bian Liang;Ma Jinrun(School of Marxism Studies, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics)

机构地区：[1]上海财经大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《台海研究》2022年第2期26-36,共11页Cross-Taiwan Strait Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“晚清台湾近代化转型与社会变迁研究”(项目批准号:19CZS037)。

摘　　要：学界长期重视对“台湾地区认同”内涵的挖掘与研究,先后有一元论、多元论、复合论等多种阐释体系。“台湾地区认同”作为一种排他性认同,是一个动态的、具有历史嬗变性的复合型概念。这就决定了“台湾地区认同”与历史发展过程联系紧密。在漫长的历史变迁过程中,“台湾地区认同”逐渐衍变出“中国台湾人认同”、“生活方式认同”、“价值观认同”、“台湾地区乡土认同”、“政治制度认同”五大认同类型。这五种认同产生顺序各异,并籍由特殊的历史事件,诞生于特定的历史阶段,具有鲜明的历史节点特征。通过历史制度主义分析,本文尝试重构“台湾地区认同”的完整意涵,并基于“台湾地区认同”的历史发展特点,探讨消弭这一排他性认同的有效路径。Cross-Strait academia has long attached great importance to the exploration and study of the connotation of “Taiwan identity”,and there have been various interpretative systems such as monism,pluralism,andcomplexism.As a kind of exclusive identity,“Taiwan identity” is a composite concept which is dynamic and develops in the course of history.This determines that “Taiwan identity” is closely related to the process of historical development.In the long process of historical change,“Taiwan identity” has gradually evolved into five main types:“Taiwan Residents identity”,“lifestyle identity”,“values identity”,and “Taiwan homeland identity”,and “political system identity”.These five types of identities emerged from different periods and were brought about by certain historical events,thus serving as distinctive historical nodes.Through the analysis of historical institutionalism,this article attempts to reconstruct the comprehensive meaning of “Taiwan identity” and takes the characteristics of the historical development of “Taiwan identity” as a departure point to explore effective ways to eliminate this exclusive identity.

关 键 词：台湾地区认同 历史制度主义 乙未割台 解严 

分 类 号：D675.8[政治法律—政治学]