检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙涛 贾兴晨 Sun Tao;Jia Xingchen
机构地区:[1]吉林省长春市人民检察院检察委员会,吉林长春130012 [2]吉林省长春市人民检察院,吉林长春130012
出 处:《行政与法》2022年第7期115-121,共7页Administration and Law
基 金:长春市检察院研究课题的阶段性成果。
摘 要:作为我国《刑法》解释的重要组成部分,职务犯罪《刑法》立法解释以刑法的具体条文为解释对象,以更加明确刑法条文的深层含义为解释目的。目前,职务犯罪《刑法》立法解释的条文规定尚存在一些问题,主要根源在于对《刑法》解释立场的模糊认知。对此,应确立形式解释论基础上的实质解释论的《刑法》解释立场,通过二者的良好结合使刑法条文得以明晰化、司法适用得以便利化,进而更好地坚持罪刑法定原则,有效打击职务犯罪,进一步保障公民权利。As an important part of the interpretation of the criminal law of our country,the legislative interpretation of the criminal law of job-related crimes takes the specific provisions of the criminal law as the object of interpretation,and the purpose of interpretation is to clarify the deep meaning of the provisions of the criminal law.At present,there are still some problems in the provisions of the legislative interpretation of the criminal law on job-related crimes,which are mainly rooted in the vague understanding of the interpretation position of the criminal law.In this regard,we should establish the interpretation position of the criminal law based on the substantive interpretation theory on the basis of the formal interpretation theory,and through the good combination of the two,the provisions of the criminal law can be clarified and the judicial application can be facilitated,so as to better adhere to the principle of legality,effectively combat job-related crimes,and further protect civil rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.37.16