检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马忠法[1] 王悦玥 安慧中 Ma Zhongfa;Wang Yueyue;An Huizhong
机构地区:[1]复旦大学法学院
出 处:《海关与经贸研究》2022年第3期1-22,共22页Journal of Customs and Trade
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“构建人类命运共同体国际法治创新研究”(项目编号:18ZDA153);国家社会科学基金重点项目“‘人类命运共同体’国际法理论与实践研究”(项目编号:18AFX025);上海市教育委员会人文社科重大项目“创新驱动发展战略下知识产权公共领域问题研究”(项目编号:2019-01-07—00-07-E00077)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:国际贸易中知识产权争端解决机制的恰当处理将会成为我国在以知识产权为核心的贸易竞争中获取优势的重要武器。现有国际贸易的知识产权争端解决机制主要由WTO和FTA的争端解决程序构成。WTO争端解决机制经多年发展,在处理与TRIPS的解释和适用有关的争端上已经较为成熟,后TRIPS时代FTA将成为主流,但其争端解决机制相较于WTO并不完备。缺乏独立的争端解决机构、缺乏履行监督机制、难以充分保障发展中国家利益、知识产权章节的具体内容可能排除FTA管辖等问题较为普遍,导致在后TRIPS时代TRIPS-Plus的语境下FTA难以应对未来更繁重的争端解决方面的压力。因此,国际贸易中的知识产权争端解决机制亟需从三方面完善:构建FTA中更为实用的争端解决机制;创新知识产权争端解决机制;重视提升中国涉外知识产权争端解决话语权,为知识产权争端解决机制提供中国方案。The proper handling of the rules and procedures governing the settlement of disputes of intellectual property in international trade is becoming an important weapon for China to gain advantages in the trade competition with intellectual property at its core.The present dispute settlement rules and procedures of intellectual property in international trade mainly consist of those of WTO and FTA.After years of development,the WTO dispute settlement system has become relatively mature in dealing with disputes related to the interpretation and application of TRIPS.In post-TRIPS era,FTA is becoming the mainstream,while its dispute settlement system is not complete compared with WTO.Due to the lack of independent dispute settlement institutions,the lack of performance supervision mechanism,the difficulty in fully safeguarding the interests of developing countries,and the fact that the specific provisions of intellectual property chapters may exclude FTA’s jurisdiction,it is quite difficult for FTA to cope with the heavier pressure of future dispute settlement under the context of TRIPS-Plus standard in post-TRIPS era.Therefore,the dispute settlement mechanism of intellectual property in international trade needs to be improved from the following three aspects:constructing a more practical mechanism in FTA;innovating the intellectual property dispute settlement system;increasing the discourse power of China in resolving foreign-related intellectual property disputes,so as to provide China’s wisdom for the intellectual property dispute settlement mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.23.53