商法视域下夫妻共同生产经营的司法适用  

The Judicial Application of the Rule of Joint Production and Operation and Commercial Law

作　　者：王炜炫 Wang Weixuan(School of Economic Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学经济法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《保定学院学报》2022年第4期48-55,共8页Journal of Baoding University

摘　　要：“共同生产经营”规则是认定夫妻共同债务的重要标准,但在夫妻一方为公司股东且因公司正常经营行为而承担连带责任的情况下,该笔债务是否为夫妻共同债务在司法实践中存在争议。多数法院认为如果股东配偶具有经营管理者身份,辅之存在促成债务形成的积极行为,则应当推定配偶参与共同生产经营。但这样的审判思路会与有限责任原则形成冲突,突破有限责任原则的情形应由法律明确规定,而不应由婚姻家事法规制商事行为。因此,排除公司作为“共同生产经营”规则的适用主体,从举债合意、共同生活或者法人格否认制度的路径保护债权人的利益,可以在保护债权人的同时缓解法条之间的冲突。The rule of joint production and operationis is an important standard for determining the matrimonial debt.However,whether the debt is matrimonial debt is controversial in judicial practice under the circumstance that one party of the couple is the shareholder of the company and bears joint responsibility due to the normal operation of the company.Most courts believe that if the spouse has the status of operator,and he implements positive behavior that promotes the formation of the debt,then the spouse should be presumed to participate in joint production and operation.But such a trial idea will raise an irreconcilable conflict with the principle of limited liability.The situation of breaking the principle should be clearly stipulated by commercial law,rather than by marriage and family regulations.Therefore,excluding the company as the applicable subject of the rule of joint production and operation,and protecting the interests of creditors from the path of debt consensus,common life or corporation personality denial system can alleviate the conflict between laws while protecting the interests of creditors.

关 键 词：共同生产经营 夫妻共同债务 有限责任原则 

分 类 号：D913.99[政治法律—民商法学]