急诊绿色通道与同期常规急诊处置治疗胫腓骨开放骨折的疗效比较  

Comparison of the effect of emergency green channel and conventional emergency treatment in the treatment of open fracture of tibia and fibula

作　　者：黄欣 胡建斌 HUANG Xin;HU Jian-bin(Enshi Central Hospiral Emergency Department,Enshi Central Hospital,Enshi 445000,China;Enshi Central Hospital Orthopedics Enshi 445000,China)

机构地区：[1]恩施市中心医院急诊科,湖北恩施445000 [2]恩施市中心医院骨科,湖北恩施445000

出　　处：《吉林医学》2022年第8期2058-2060,共3页Jilin Medical Journal

基　　金：湖北省科研项目[项目编号:WJ2021F098]。

摘　　要：目的:探讨急诊绿色通道与同期常规急诊处置治疗胫腓骨开放骨折的效果。方法:选取胫腓骨开放骨折患者126例为研究对象,随机分为传统组(常规急诊处置治疗)和快捷组(急诊绿色通道处置治疗)各63例。观察两组的临床疗效、围术期一般情况及并发症。结果:快捷组总有效率高于常规组(P<0.05);快捷组等待手术及住院时间短于传统组(P<0.05),而手术时间与传统组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后快捷组总并发症发生率低于传统组(P<0.05)。结论:急诊绿色通道处置治疗胫腓骨开放骨折能缩短患者等待手术及住院时间,降低并发症发生率,效果显著。Objective To compare the effect of emergency green channel and conventional emergency treatment in the treatment of open fracture of tibia and fibula.Method A total of 126 patients with open fractures of the tibia and fibula were selected and divided into the traditional group(routine emergency treatment)and the fast group(emergency green)according to the computer grouping method.channel treatment,63 cases in each group.The clinical efficacy,perioperative general conditions and complications of the two groups were observed.Results The total effective rate in the fast group was higher than that of the conventional group(P>0.05);after treatment,the total complications of the fast group was lower than that of the traditional group(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with the conventional emergency department during the same period,emergency green channel treatment for open fracture of tibia and fibula can shorten the waiting time for surgery and hospitalization,and reduce the incidence of complications,with significant effect.

关 键 词：胫腓骨开放骨折 急诊 绿色通道 手术时间 

分 类 号：R687.3[医药卫生—骨科学]