检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:长野史宽 张慰(译)[2] Fumihiro Nagano;Zhang Wei
机构地区:[1]京都大学 [2]南京大学法学院暨中德法研究所
出 处:《南大法学》2022年第4期170-184,共15页NanJing University Law Journal
摘 要:日本的法律评注是19世纪末以西方法律为模板颁布法律后的产物。日本国内许多因素共同促成了评注在日本的发展。民法领域中对德国法的“理论继受”以及美国推动的“民主化”对评注的发展均有作用,但仍以德国对日本法律评注发展的影响最大。日本的法律评注与德国的评注具一定的近似性,但具自身特点。日本的法律评注等文献形式及其相互关系以特别的方式反映出了日本法的特征。日本法律体系中评注的价值地位反映了其体系化的程度以及法律文本的权威性。Japan's legal commentary is the product of the promulgation of laws based on western laws at the end of the 19th century.Many factors in Japan have contributed to the development of the commentary in Japan.In the field of civil law,the“theoretical inheritance”of German law and the“democratization”promoted by the United States have played a role in the development of commentary,but Germany still has the greatest impact on the development of Japan's legal commentary.Japan's legal commentary is similar to Germany's,but it still has its own characteristics.Japan's legal commentary and other document forms and their mutual relations reflect the characteristics of Japan's law in a special way.The value status of commentary in the Japanese legal system reflects the degree of systematization and the authority of legal texts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15