论合宪性解释规则的司法适用路径  

On the Judicial Application Path of Interpretation of Constitutionality Rules

作　　者：冯柏林 FENG Bolin(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei 430072,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,武汉430072

出　　处：《南京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第3期90-96,共7页Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics（Social Sciences）

摘　　要：合宪性解释规则包括单纯解释规则、冲突规则和保全规则。单纯解释规则与冲突规则在司法裁判中混淆适用的问题需要阐明“宪法何时出场”,而两者的界定也明确了合宪性解释作为独立解释方法的基本立场。合宪性解释保全规则与合宪性审查具有异质性,违宪疑虑作为宪法事实的客观存在导致了保全规则出现在司法裁判中的必然性。合宪性解释在不同涉宪情形下适用路径不同,其能够为推动宪法实施和合宪性审查的制度建构提供具体司法路径,与具体审查的程序衔接则赖于最高人民法院宪法解释请求权的启动。Interpretation of constitutionality rules include interpretation rule, conflicts rule and preservation rule.The confusion between interpretation rule and conflicts rule in judicial adjudication needs to be solved by clarifying“when the constitution is at play”, and the distinction of the two also clarifies the basic position of interpretation of constitutionality as an independent interpretation method. The interpretation of constitutionality of preservation rule and constitutional review are heterogeneous. Unconstitutional doubts as the objective existence of constitutional facts lead to the necessity of preservation rule appearing in judicial adjudication. The application paths of interpretation of constitutionality are different in different constitutional situations, and it can provide specific judicial paths for promoting the implementation of the constitution and the institutional construction of constitutional review. The procedural connection with specific review depends on the initiation of the constitutional interpretation claim right of the Supreme People’s Court.

关 键 词：合宪性解释 独立解释方法 合宪性审查 宪法司法适用 

分 类 号：D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]